by Jim Parry
And this is our life, exempt from public haunt,
Finds tongues in trees, books in the running brooks,
Sermons in stones, and good in everything.
— From As You Like It by William Shakespeare
The natural environment creates a sense of awe and mystery for children
as well as adults. From woodland creatures, mighty oaks, and mountains
to the tiniest worm, nature through a child's eyes is wonder to
behold. With this editorial, Camping Magazine begins a series of articles
in the next five issues that seeks to bring the importance of environmental
awareness to the fore. This comprehensive exposé of green architecture
at camp, nature activities, the latest environmental research, and resources
will help you integrate "green thinking" into your camp setting.
It's the right thing to do.
Isn't camp about providing the best things for children? Don't
we all know that camp benefits kids in ways hard to measure, but those
benefits endure?
Somehow, in our efforts to make camp more immediate and exciting, we
have mitigated the integration of the outdoors in camp programs. As camps
strive to keep up with modern times, getting nicer facilities and more
types of recreation, campers are able to separate themselves from the
natural world.
Scientists are documenting this change in our culture. In one study,
approximately 60 percent of children reported that they had seen more
animals on television and movies than they had in the wild. Only 40 percent
of rural children reported they had ever spent more than half an hour
in a wild place, and less than 20 percent of urban children have seen
wildlife in a natural setting (Nabhan and Trimble 1998).
Fundamental to this cultural loss is the phenomenon Robert Michael Pyle
has termed "the extinction of experience," or the termination
of direct, frequent contact between children and wildlife. While many
children may visit zoos, watch nature films, or cuddle with pets and stuffed
animals, their responses to other species have become more "politically
correct" but less grounded on their own visceral experiences. Pyle
elaborates on the cycle of disaffection that is triggered by this extinction
of experience. "As cities metastasizing suburbs forsake their natural
diversity, and their citizens grow more removed from personal contact
with nature, awareness and appreciation retreat. This breeds apathy toward
environmental concerns and, inevitably, further degradation of common
habitat, leading to the loss of rarities. People who care, conserve; people
who don't know, don't care. What is the extinction of the
condor to a child who has never seen a wren (Pyle 1993)?"
The media bombards us with environmental issues and debate so much,
it becomes an issue to turn on or off, like a difficult class, or sales
pitch, or "more politics." Our natural, justified response is
to avoid it, numbed. But these matters are closer than ever. We see farm
fields become housing developments. Increasing occurrences of asthma are
linked to dirtier air. Traffic delays are more common. Places where adults
once played are not safe for their children. Ironically, our response
seems to be to increase our isolation from normal, natural things. Playing
in the woods is replaced with soccer, and walking in the meadow is now
a game of golf.
With computers and experts everywhere, we are not more ignorant; we
simply are the victims of our choices. Eliot Wigginton, editor of the
popular Foxfire series summarizes in this way: "We have become information-rich,
and experience-poor (Wigginton 1972)."
It is no longer the most natural thing in the world to just enjoy being
outside. Are we to the point where we "schedule in" the watching
of a sunset, to marvel at the flight of a bird, or to pause for the din
of katydids nearby? If camp is an integrated part of growing up, and I
believe it is, then whenever possible we should take responsibility to
build children and youths' relationship with the outdoors. Pun intended,
being among nature should become natural again!
The Shrinking Nature Program
The camp business is different now. Imagine the counselors making announcements
after lunch. One says he's playing a camp version of Quiddich. Another
invites everyone to the water slide. After so many other thrills, another
counselor says she will take the kids for a walk in the forest. So it
is, we compete for campers' thrills! Giving choice to campers, "selling
the nature program," compared to skateboarding or dance class is
difficult. A brochure photo of a camper walking in the woods is nice,
but compare that to a hot- dogger on water skis, a costumed clown, a hip-hop
dance, a high-speed zip line, or a camp theater production. What's the
message? Enjoying nature is a choice, like ordering from a menu. Nature
programs are broccoli among fast food burgers and fries.
Some campers do make the choice, and really enjoy their experiences.
Many campers find great role models while participating in nature activities,
or somehow their personality fits well in what is usually a quieter program.
And certainly many whole camps succeed admirably with excellent nature
programs.
For so many people the expertise is hard to find. Schools don't teach
the names of trees or identification of birds and frogs. Environmental
education takes a back seat to reading, writing, and arithmetic for counselors
as well as campers. Camps own and act as gateways to thousands, even millions
of acres of natural space. Even a mowed yard can build an experience of
outdoor love in some young heart, if it is nurtured well.
The Goal
The goal is to instill a more positive relationship with the natural
world. We should add this to the many purposes of camp, all of which are
crucial to healthy child development. There are many means to this end,
and many of them have fallen out of fashion for political or other reasons.
We do not have to spike the trees, carry protest signs, or write angry
letters to our representatives. We need not join a radical club, take
grueling trips to the wilderness, or issue a decree that all chemicals
are evil. It is not necessary to force everyone to become a vegetarian.
We can avoid a return to the Stone Age. This is not an extreme sport.
It does not require a political affiliation. A moderate, more publicly
acceptable approach is not that difficult. In fact, it fulfills our obligation
to the public.
It's not all bad. Environmental programs seem to be on the rise nationally.
Through the efforts of schools, some children have been in more wild places
or are more ready to recycle than their parents. Baby boomers and their
children are visiting parks and nature centers in growing numbers. It
is not hard to find books and resources, and more on the topic of environmental
preservation. Membership in the National Association for Interpretation
is higher than ever.
Camp: A Blend of Environmental and Developmental Learning
Still, these are programs; things we do . . . . yet, we offer something
else. We offer the camp experience. Camp and its ecological appeal offer
us an advantage in what we can achieve in environmental education. The
American Camp Association is currently studying how "Camp Gives Kids
a World of Good®." It seems that current environmental education
and child development research are largely separate fields. Ideally, the
camp experience blends these. That magic, hard-to-measure aspect of camp
includes new chances to succeed, exposure to role models, new friends,
new skills and experiences — all taking place closer to the natural
world than any other learning environment. Studies on what motivates people
to care about the environment often cite (1) time spent outdoors and (2)
the influences of adults, as having the most impact. Does that say "camp,"
or what?
Rekindling the Natural Relationship at Camp
While the camp experience can become a natural blend for developmental
and environmental learning for campers, often children find too much comfort
in front of the computer and television screens. Could it be that we have
become a society that hates spiders, dirty jeans, poison ivy, and mosquitoes
more than we love sunsets, robins, and shade trees? It seems we satisfy
ourselves with golf courses over meadows and videos instead of rain on
our faces.
It's easy to presume that camps are an antidote to this mode of thinking.
After all, most camps emphasize the outdoors. But there is a great danger
in our assuming that being in the natural world automatically builds a
relationship with it.
Camp nature centers are getting fewer and farther between. We hire more
sports or arts leaders than naturalists. Are camp directors chasing the
trends and forgetting those values that inspired them to get into this
business in the first place? Water skiing doesn't teach that a lake is
an ecosystem. Did anyone notice the crickets chirping during the evening
program? Is the cabin group walking just to get there, or will they see
the wildflowers?
We simply need to be deliberate about loving the natural world and share
this with campers. We know that camp makes profound memories that change
lives. Children gain "hard skills," such as kicking a soccer
ball and learning to trim a sail. They gain "soft skills," like
making friends, independence, honesty, and responsibility. In this fast
paced, man-made world, we need to include a positive relationship with
nature on the list of essential outcomes for a camp experience. It is
just as important that children have good memories of nature as their
memories of their bunk mates, counselors, songs, and games.
Anna Botsford Comstock in her Handbook of Nature Study says, "Let
us not inflict permanent injury on the child by turning him away from
nature instead of toward it. However, if the love of nature is in the
teacher's heart, there is no danger; such a teacher, no matter by what
method, takes the child gently by the hand and walks with him in paths
that lead to the seeing and comprehending of what he may find beneath
his feet or above his head. And these paths, whether they lead among the
lowliest plants, or whether to the stars, finally converge and bring the
wandered to that serene peace and hopeful faith that they are working
units of this wonderful universe."
| References |
| Botsford Comstock, A. (1939). Handbook of Nature
Study. Comstock Publishing. |
| Nabhan, G.P. and Trimble S. (1998). The Geography
of Childhood. Beacon Press. pp. 87, 91. |
| Pyle, R.M. (1993). The Thunder Tree. Houghton
Mifflin. |
| Wigginton, E. ed. (1972). Foxfire Series. "Preface."
Anchor Doubleday Books. |
Originally published in the 2005 January/February
issue of Camping Magazine.
|